Can destructors be declared as pure virtual? [closed]

Posted by skydoor on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by skydoor
Published on 2010-03-20T01:04:40Z Indexed on 2010/03/20 1:51 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 434

Filed under:

c++

|

destructor

|

pure-virtual

|

abstract-class

Possible Duplicate:
Why do we need a pure virtual destructor in C++?

I know that the destructor can be virtual, how about pure virtual?

If yes, what's the usage? If not, what's the error, compile error or runtime error?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++

Which C++ book shold I get between "C++ Primer" vs "C++ Primer Plus"

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I want to learn C++ by using Vim and MinGW as compiler. I'm interesting at "C++ Primer (4th Edition)" and "C++ Primer Plus (5th Edition)" but I don't know how about it different. It has no book store that I can review those books, so I want to know, what is the different between those book and which… >>> More
C++ : C++ Primer (Stanley Lipmann) or The C++ programming language (special edition)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a Computer Science degree (long2 time ago) .. I do know Java OOP but i am now trying to pick up C++. I do have C and of course data structure using C or pascal. I have started reading Bjarne Stroustrup book (The C++ Programming Language - Special Edition) but find it extremely difficult esp… >>> More
I need help on my C++ assignment using MS Visual C++

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Ok, so I don't want you to do my homework for me, but I'm a little lost with this final assignment and need all the help I can get. Learning about programming is tough enough, but doing it online is next to impossible for me... Now, to get to the program, I am going to paste what I have so far. This… >>> More
Managed c++ std::string not accessible in unmanaged c++

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
In unmanaged c++ dll i have a function which takes constant std::string as argument Prototype : void read ( const std::string &imageSpec_ ) I call this function from managed c++ dll by passing a std::string. When i debug the unmanaged c++ code the parameter imageSpec_ shows the value correctly… >>> More
The Definitive C++ Book Guide and List

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
After more than a few questions about deciding on C++ books I thought we could make a better community wiki version. Providing QUALITY books and an approximate skill level. Maybe we can add a short blurb/description about each book that you have personally read / benefited from. Feel free to debate… >>> More

Related posts about destructor

Declaring refrences /objects in Destructor of a class

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Does it make any sense of declaring objects or refrences in a destructor of a class in C++? I mean class A { A() { } ~A() { //Declaring refrences or objects here // } } >>> More
An interesting case of delete and destructor (C++)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a piece of code where I can call destructor multiple times and access member functions even the destructor was called with member variables' values preserved. I was still able to access member functions after I called delete but the member variables were nullified (all to 0). And I can't double… >>> More
Can a destructor be recursive?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is this program well-defined, and if not, why exactly? #include <iostream> #include <new> struct X { int cnt; X (int i) : cnt(i) {} ~X() { std::cout << "destructor called, cnt=" << cnt << std::endl; if ( cnt-- > 0 ) … >>> More
GCC destructor behaviour

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I've noticed a difference in behaviour for gcc's destructor when compiled under linux and crosscompiled with mingw. On linux the destructor will not get called unless the program terminates normally by itself (returns from main). I guess that kind of makes sense if you take signal handlers into account… >>> More
Does a C++ destructor always or only sometimes call data member destructors?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to validate my understanding of C++ destructors. I've read many times that C++ supplies a default destructor if I don't write one myself. But does this mean that if I DO write a destructor that the compiler WON'T still provide the default cleanup of stack-allocated class fields? My hunch… >>> More